Ketroser

Ketroser v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20223:19-cv-05231California1,122 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DEIDRE KELLOGG KETROSER, Case No. 19-cv-05231-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO FILE SECOND

SUPPLEMENTAL THIRD AMENDED

7-ELEVEN, INC., et al., COMPLAINT Defendants.

12 Before the Court is plaintiff Deidre Kellogg Ketroser’s (“Ketroser”) motion, filed November 14, 2022, for “Leave to File a Second Supplemental Third Amended Complaint.” Defendants 7-Eleven, Inc. and Southland Corp. (collectively, “7-Eleven”) have filed opposition, to which Ketroser has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for determination on the parties’ respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for January 17, 2023, and rules as follows. Ketroser, an individual who requires a walker and cane for mobility, sues for disability discrimination in connection with access barriers she encountered when visiting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.