Henneberry

Henneberry v. City of Newark

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20223:13-cv-05238California1,697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN PATRICK HENNEBERRY, Case No. 13-cv-05238-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL WITH

CONDITIONS

CITY OF NEWARK, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 368 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Counsel from Durie Tangri LLP, appointed by this Court to represent Plaintiff John Henneberry, has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. ECF No. 368. No opposition has been filed. The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the January 19, 2023 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the record in this case and relevant legal authority, the Court GRANTS the motion for the following reasons. II. BACKGROUND On October 25, 2018, Mr. Henneberry accepted the Court’s offer to refer this matter to the Federal Pro Bono Project, run by the Justice & Diversity Center of the Bar Association of San Francisco. ECF No. 201. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.