Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. Google LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20223:20-cv-04688California2,861 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANIBAL RODRIGUEZ, et al., Case No. 20-cv-04688-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

GOOGLE LLC, LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED

COMPLAINT AND DENYING Defendant. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS

15 Plaintiffs bring three separate motions relating to the Complaint and case schedule in the matter.1 Dkts. 254, 257, 260. For the reasons that follow, the Motion for Relief from the Case Management Schedule and the Request for the Appointment of a Special Master are both denied; and the Motion for Leave to File a Fourth Amended Complaint is granted in part and denied in part. I. Motion for Relief from Case Management Schedule Plaintiffs’ first motion requests a three-month extension of all the deadlines in the Case Management Schedule on the grounds that Google has engaged in “gamesmanship,” resulting in discovery…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.