Google LLC v. Sonos, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20223:20-cv-06754California1,060 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GOOGLE LLC, Plaintiff, No. C 20-06754 WHA

v.

SONOS, INC., ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE

SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM

Defendant.

CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING

16 17 Google has filed a motion for leave to file supplemental claim construction briefing (Dkt. No. 375). The basis for its motion is its recent discovery of statements made by Sonos’s Australian counsel during the foreign prosecution of an “Australian counterpart” to U.S. Patent No. 10,779,033. Sonos opposes, arguing that the statements it made in the Australian prosecution do not justify revisiting settled claim construction positions (Dkt. No. 389). This motion is suitable for resolution on the papers. Civ. L.R. 7-6. The ’033 patent is directed to transferring playback of a “remote playback queue” from a “computing device” to a “playback device.” In plain English, the patent relates to, for example, transferring audio playback of a music playlist from a smart phone to a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.