Cho

Cho v. City Of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20225:21-cv-05503California2,892 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ANTHONY SUNG CHO, Case No. 21-cv-05503-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v. AND OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, Defendants. 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 60, 61

13 This order resolves the parties’ motions in limine and other disputes concerning the admissibility and/or manner of presentation of evidence. Dkt. Nos. 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 60, 61. I. MR. CHO’S MOTIONS IN LIMINE A. Motions in Limine Nos. 1 and 2 re Mr. Cho’s Criminal History Mr. Cho moves to exclude any evidence, testimony, argument, or reference at trial to his criminal history and prior contacts with law enforcement, including the fact that at the time of the incident in question he was on Post Release County Supervision and had automobile theft charges pending against him. Dkt. Nos. 44,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.