Mendoza

Mendoza v. Koenig

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20223:21-cv-05045California4,421 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERTO FRANCISCO MENDOZA, Case No. 21-cv-05045-EMC

Petitioner, ORDER (1) DENYING PETITIONER’S

IMPLIED MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION, AND (2)

GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

LUIS MARTINEZ, MOTION TO DISMISS Respondent. Docket Nos. 6, 9,

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Roberto Francisco Mendoza, an inmate currently housed at the Correctional Training Facility, filed this pro se action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Docket No. 1-2 (“Petition”). Having reviewed the parties’ briefs as well as the underlying record, the Court concludes that Mr. Mendoza is not entitled to habeas relief based on the claims presented for the reasons raised in Respondent’s Dismissal Motion. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Mr. Mendoza’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. II. BACKGROUND Mr. Mendoza was convicted in Monterey County Superior Court of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.