Bernstein

Bernstein v. Virgin America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20224:15-cv-02277California4,781 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JULIA BERNSTEIN, et al., Case No. 15-cv-02277-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT

VIRGIN AMERICA, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 447 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Judgment. ECF No. 447. The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. I. BACKGROUND The factual and procedural background to this class action is summarized in greater detail in this Court’s order of January 5, 2017, regarding Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 121. In short, Plaintiffs are flight attendants who worked for Defendant Virgin America, Inc., and Defendant Alaska Airlines, Inc., (collectively, “Virgin”) in California. Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) ¶ 2, ECF No. 298. Plaintiffs alleged that Virgin failed to pay its flight attendants minimum wage (Cal. Lab. Code §§ 1182.12, 1194, 1194.2), overtime (Cal. Lab. Code §§ 510), and for all hours worked (Cal. Lab. Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.