Proofpoint, Inc. v. Vade Secure, Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20223:19-cv-04238California2,710 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PROOFPOINT, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-04238-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' v. MOTION FOR PERMANENT

INJUNCTION AND FOR FINAL

VADE SECURE, INCORPORATED, et DISPOSITION; DIRECTIONS TO al., PARTIES 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is the Motion for Permanent Injunction and Final Disposition, filed July 1, 2022, by plaintiffs Proofpoint, Inc. ("Proofpoint") and Cloudmark LLC ("Cloudmark"). Defendants Vade Secure, Inc., Vade Secure SASU (collectively, "Vade") and Olivier Lemarié ("Lemarié") have filed opposition, to which plaintiffs have replied. The matter came on regularly for hearing on August 12, 2022, at which time Sean Pak and Iman Lordgooei of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP appeared on behalf of plaintiffs, Douglas Lumish and Arman Zahoory of Latham & Watkins LLP appeared on behalf of Vade, and Adam Cashman of Singer Cashman LLP appeared on behalf…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.