Tulcanaza

Tulcanaza v. GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20223:22-cv-05657California760 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARKO TULCANAZA, Case No. 22-cv-05657-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, Re: Dkt. No. 20 INC., et al., 11 Defendants.

12 On October 7, 2022, defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”) and GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. (“GreenPoint”) moved to dismiss all of Tulcanaza’s claims against them. See Dkts. 8, 10. Tulcanaza failed to timely oppose the motions. Accordingly, on November 28, I issued an order to show cause for failure to prosecute and allowed Tulcanza to oppose the motions by December 5. Dkt. 18. Tulcanaza subsequently filed a statement of non-opposition to the MERS motion to dismiss but did not address GreenPoint’s motion. Dkt. 19. Because it was unclear whether Tulcanaza sought to dismiss his claims against GreenPoint as well, on December 12 I ordered Tulcanaza to respond to GreenPoint’s motion by or before December 19, or else his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.