Davis

Davis v. Clearlake Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20233:22-cv-01481California560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID M. DAVIS, Case No. 22-cv-01481-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

CLEARLAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 On July 14, 2022, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's civil rights complaint. (ECF No. 9.) The 13 claims against Defendants Clearlake Police Department, Lieutenant Herman, Sergeant Celli, and 14 Officer Hobbs (“the Clearlake County Defendants”) were dismissed for failure to present a cognizable claim for relief, and Plaintiff was granted 28 days to file an amended complaint. (Id.) 16 Thereafter, he was granted an extension of time to December 14, 2022, to amend. (ECF No. 15.) 17 Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Rather, on December 19, 2022, Plaintiff 18 filed a “response” to the order dismissing the complaint with leave to amend in which he argues 19 that his complaint should not have been dismissed. (ECF No. 16.) To the extent Plaintiff seeks 20 reconsideration of the Court’s order, he must obtain leave to do so by showing: (1) that at the time 21 of the motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.