Hazzard

Hazzard v. Schaaf

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20234:22-cv-02921California1,745 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GENE HAZZARD, Case No. 22-cv-02921-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT AND DENYING NOTICE

LIBBY SCHAAF, et al., OF REQUEST TO BE HEARD Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 31, 39

12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss filed by the following Defendants: the City of Oakland (“City”); Mayor Libby Schaaf (“Mayor Schaaf”); David Silver; Barbara J. Parker; Courtney Ruby (“Ruby”); and Ed Reiskin (collectively “City Defendants”).1 The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it finds the motion suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The Court HEREBY VACATES the hearing scheduled for January 13, 2023, and it GRANTS 19 Plaintiff also sued Mialisa Bonta, Andy Fremder, Rob Bonta, and Sabrina Landreth 20 (“Landreth”). To date, these Defendants have not appeared.

21 On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.