Malberg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 MARTIN MALBERG, Case No. 22-cv-01788-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION TO AMEND OR ALTER

JUDGMENT

ROBERT CASHEN, et al., [Re: ECF No. 65] Defendants.

12 The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s motion to alter judgment (ECF No. 65), which “moves the court to alter the initial judgment that may have been based on claims, rights declarations, and evidence of rights and violations in a format not accepted by the court.” The Court construes Plaintiff’s motion as motion to alter or amend a judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). Defendants oppose Plaintiff’s motion. See ECF No. 72. The motion was not noticed for hearing, and the Court finds it suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), a party may file a motion to alter or amend a judgment within 28 days after the entry of the…