Mai
Mai v. Supercell Oy
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 PETER MAI, et al., Case No. 20-cv-05573-EJD
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS FIRST AMENDED
v. COMPLAINT
SUPERCELL OY, Re: ECF No. 52 Defendant.
Before the Court is Defendant Supercell Oy’s (“Supercell”) Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). See Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 52 (“Motion”). The Court finds the Motion appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). ECF No. 60. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss without leave to amend and dismisses the action with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Peter Mai (“Mai”) and Diego Niño1 (“Niño,” and collectively, “Plaintiffs”) allege that Supercell, a Finnish mobile video game development company, has engaged in unlawful and unfair conduct via the development, promotion, and sale of “loot boxes” in two of its…