Mai

Mai v. Supercell Oy

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20235:20-cv-05573California4,631 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 PETER MAI, et al., Case No. 20-cv-05573-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT

SUPERCELL OY, Re: ECF No. 52 Defendant.

Before the Court is Defendant Supercell Oy’s (“Supercell”) Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). See Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 52 (“Motion”). The Court finds the Motion appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). ECF No. 60. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss without leave to amend and dismisses the action with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Peter Mai (“Mai”) and Diego Niño1 (“Niño,” and collectively, “Plaintiffs”) allege that Supercell, a Finnish mobile video game development company, has engaged in unlawful and unfair conduct via the development, promotion, and sale of “loot boxes” in two of its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.