Lenk

Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20235:20-cv-08094California1,044 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KENNETH LAWRENCE LENK, Case No. 20-cv-08094-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL; AND DENYING

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND

OR ALTER JUDGMENT PURSUANT

Defendant. TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(e) 13 [Re: ECF 80, 81]

15 Before the Court are two post-judgment motions filed by pro se Plaintiff Kenneth Lenk (“Lenk”): (1) Request for Counsel (ECF 81) and (2) Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 59(e) (ECF 80). Defendant Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (“MPS”) has filed opposition (ECF 82) to the Rule 59(e) motion. The Court finds the motions suitable for decision without further briefing and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1 (b). Lenk’s motions are DENIED for the reasons discussed below. I. BACKGROUND This is the fourth unsuccessful lawsuit Lenk has filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.