Lenk
Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KENNETH LAWRENCE LENK, Case No. 20-cv-08094-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL; AND DENYING
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND
OR ALTER JUDGMENT PURSUANT
Defendant. TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(e) 13 [Re: ECF 80, 81]
15 Before the Court are two post-judgment motions filed by pro se Plaintiff Kenneth Lenk (“Lenk”): (1) Request for Counsel (ECF 81) and (2) Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 59(e) (ECF 80). Defendant Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (“MPS”) has filed opposition (ECF 82) to the Rule 59(e) motion. The Court finds the motions suitable for decision without further briefing and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1 (b). Lenk’s motions are DENIED for the reasons discussed below. I. BACKGROUND This is the fourth unsuccessful lawsuit Lenk has filed…