Dominguez

Dominguez v. Sonesta International Hotels Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20233:22-cv-03027California5,341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BERTHA DOMINGUEZ,

Case No. 22-cv-03027-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

SONESTA INTERNATIONAL HOTELS COMPEL ARBITRATION

CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, Plaintiff Bertha Dominguez asserts various wage and hour claims under the California Labor Code, including a claim for civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”), against her former employer, Sonesta International Hotels Corporation (“Sonesta”). Presently before the Court is Sonesta’s Motion to Compel Arbitration (“Motion”). The Court finds that the Motion is suitable for determination without oral argument and therefore vacates the motion hearing set for January 6, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). The Case Management Conference set for the same date will be held at 2:00 p.m. instead of 9:30 a.m.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.