Castellanos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIA CASTELLANOS, Case No. 22-cv-02191-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR A

TRO AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY

LES ZIEVE, et al., JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 34, 35, 37,

12 Pending before the Court are Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 14, “Motion to Dismiss”), Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 34), Plaintiff’s motions for temporary injunction (Dkt. Nos. 35, 38)1, and Plaintiff’s administrative motion to have her December 30, 2022 amended petition deemed timely (Dkt. No. 37). Plaintiff is proceeding without counsel. The Court finds the pending motions appropriate for disposition without oral argument and deems them to be submitted. Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and two motions for…