Sunnergren

Sunnergren v. Bright

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20235:22-cv-00746California1,802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK E. SUNNERGREN,

Case No. 22-cv-00746 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

v.

14 DARRIN BRIGHT, et al.,

Defendants.

17 Mr. Mark E. Sunnergren, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 regarding deficient medical care at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). Dkt. No. 1. The Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, to correct deficiencies in his attempt to state an Eighth Amendment claim. Dkt. No. 22. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. No. 24. 23 DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.