Page

Page v. Response Marketing Group, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20234:22-cv-06194California4,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SALLY PAGE, Case No. 22-cv-06194-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL

JURISDICTION

MARK BROBERG, Re: Dkt. No. 14 Defendant.

12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) filed by Defendant Mark Broberg (“Broberg” or “Defendant”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in the case, and it finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The Court VACATES the hearing scheduled for January 13, 2023. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND In February 2019, Plaintiff Sally Page (“Page”) attended a two and a half day in-person training seminar on investing options in San Jose, California provided by Interactive Trader1 and taught by Defendant Broberg. (Compl.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.