Bynum

Bynum v. Sweet

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20235:21-cv-05833California10,235 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JIM CARTER BYNUM,

Case No. 21-cv-05833 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

SWEET’S MOTION TO DISMISS;

v. GRANTING DEFENDANT

LAUFIK’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; M. K. SWEET, et al., DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISCOVERY MOTIONS AS Defendants.

MOOT

16 (Docket Nos. 13, 30, 33, 40, 42, 43)

18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against medical personnel at the Correctional Training Facility in 20 Soledad (“CTF”). Dkt. No. 1. The Court found the complaint stated a cognizable claim 21 for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against Defendant Dr. Mary K. Sweet 22 and exercised supplemental jurisdiction over a negligence claim against Defendant Dr. 23 Martin Laufik. Dkt. No. 9. 24 Defendant Sweet filed a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.