Bynum
Bynum v. Sweet
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JIM CARTER BYNUM,
Case No. 21-cv-05833 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
SWEET’S MOTION TO DISMISS;
v. GRANTING DEFENDANT
LAUFIK’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT; M. K. SWEET, et al., DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISCOVERY MOTIONS AS Defendants.
MOOT
16 (Docket Nos. 13, 30, 33, 40, 42, 43)
18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against medical personnel at the Correctional Training Facility in 20 Soledad (“CTF”). Dkt. No. 1. The Court found the complaint stated a cognizable claim 21 for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against Defendant Dr. Mary K. Sweet 22 and exercised supplemental jurisdiction over a negligence claim against Defendant Dr. 23 Martin Laufik. Dkt. No. 9. 24 Defendant Sweet filed a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the…