Hughes
United States v. Hughes
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 18-cv-05931-JCS
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
TIMBERLY E. HUGHES, Re: Dkt. No. 177 Defendants.
Defendant Timberly Hughes, pro se, moves to dismiss the United States’ claim against her for violation of the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”). As a starting point, Hughes has not complied with this Court’s local rules, including the requirements to notice a hearing date and provide a proposed order. Civ. L.R. 7-2. Hughes also has not identified any applicable rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or other potentially applicable procedural mechanism, under which she brings her motion. And at the moment, the case formally remains closed, since judgment was entered after a bench trial and the Court denied without prejudice the parties’ stipulation to reopen, so there is nothing to dismiss—although a case management conference remains set for Friday, January 6, 2023 to discuss the…