Hughes

United States v. Hughes

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20233:18-cv-05931California620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 18-cv-05931-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

TIMBERLY E. HUGHES, Re: Dkt. No. 177 Defendants.

Defendant Timberly Hughes, pro se, moves to dismiss the United States’ claim against her for violation of the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”). As a starting point, Hughes has not complied with this Court’s local rules, including the requirements to notice a hearing date and provide a proposed order. Civ. L.R. 7-2. Hughes also has not identified any applicable rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or other potentially applicable procedural mechanism, under which she brings her motion. And at the moment, the case formally remains closed, since judgment was entered after a bench trial and the Court denied without prejudice the parties’ stipulation to reopen, so there is nothing to dismiss—although a case management conference remains set for Friday, January 6, 2023 to discuss the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.