Ayoub

Ayoub v. Harry Winston, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20224:21-cv-01599California3,426 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAMER SROUR AYOUB, Case No. 21-cv-01599-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING SECOND

v. MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA

SETTLEMENT

HARRY WINSTON, INC., Re: ECF No. 45 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Samer Srour Ayoub’s second unopposed motion for approval of a settlement of claims under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”), Cal. Lab. Code § 2698 et seq. ECF No. 45. The Court will grant the motion for approval of the settlement amount and grant Ayoub’s request for an award of attorney’s fees and costs in part. I. BACKGROUND Ayoub worked as a security guard at the store of Defendant Harry Winston, Inc., from March 15, 2019, to September 28, 2020. ECF No. 45 at 3. Following the end of his employment, Ayoub filed a complaint against Harry Winston, asserting individual claims for wage and hour violations and derivative claims under PAGA on behalf of himself and other non-exempt security officers in California employed by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.