Gomez
Gomez v. Reynolds Creative Products, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANDRES GOMEZ, Case No. 22-cv-00830-JST
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE
v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION
REYNOLDS CREATIVE PRODUCTS, Re: ECF No.
INC.,
11 Defendants.
12 After reviewing Plaintiff Andres Gomez’s response to the order to show cause as to why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim, the Court will now decline to exercise such jurisdiction. District courts “have supplemental jurisdiction over all . . . claims that are so related to claims in the action” over which the Court has original jurisdiction “that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution.” 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). Plaintiff’s Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) claim and Unruh Act claim “form part of the ‘same case or controversy’ for purposes of § 1367(a)” because they both “derive from a common nucleus of operative fact and are…