Cotterill

Cotterill v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20234:08-cv-02295California2,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHERYL COTTERILL, Case No. 08-cv-02295-JSW

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. VACATE JUDGMENT AND DENYING

MOTION TO DISQUALIFY

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 377, 381 14 Defendants.

15 Now before the Court are two motions filed by Gregory M. Haynes (“Haynes”), attorney for the nominative plaintiff. Nine years after entry of judgment and seven years after the judgment and award was affirmed on appeal, Haynes seeks to vacate the judgment and to disqualify the undersigned. For the reasons stated herein, these motions are DENIED. BACKGROUND The factual background is familiar to the parties. Haynes represented Cheryl Cotterill (“Plaintiff”) in the underlying lawsuit for claims of civil rights violations by The Regents of the University of California (“Regents”), the City and County of San Francisco (the “City”), and multiple individuals who were employees of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.