Garcia

Garcia v. Sun-Hayward, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20234:21-cv-08574California1,205 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ORLANDO GARCIA, Case No. 21-cv-08574-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE

v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

SUN-HAYWARD, LLC, Re: ECF No. 16 Defendants.

12 After reviewing Plaintiff Orlando Garcia’s response to the order to show cause issued by Judge Gonzalez Rogers as to why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim, ECF No. 16, the Court will now decline to exercise such jurisdiction. District courts “have supplemental jurisdiction over all . . . claims that are so related to claims in the action” over which the Court has original jurisdiction “that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution.” 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). Plaintiff’s Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) claim and Unruh Act claim “form part of the ‘same case or controversy’ for purposes of § 1367(a)” because they both “derive from a …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.