Pinn

Pinn v. Consumer Credit Counseling Foundation, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20234:22-cv-04048California3,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KELLY PINN, Case No. 22-cv-04048-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

v. FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION

COMPLAINT

CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING FOUNDATION, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 22 11 Defendants. 12 Defendants Consumer Credit Counseling Foundation (“CCCF”); National Budget Planners of South Florida, Inc. (“NBP”); and Ishwinder Judge, an individual, move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiff Kelly Pinn’s first amended class action complaint. [Docket No. 22.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7- 1(b). For the following reasons, the motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND In this putative class action, Pinn challenges Defendants’ alleged practice of making unsolicited telemarketing phone calls to telephones of individuals who have registered their phone numbers on the national Do Not Call registry. Pinn makes the following allegations in the first …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.