Quintell
Quintell v. Tomko
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RANDI QUINTELL,
Case No. 22-cv-09158-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915
DANIEL TOMKO, [CORRECTED]
10 Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Randi Quintell, pro se, applied to proceed in forma pauperis and the Court granted her application. See Docket No. 4. The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s complaint to determine whether it satisfies 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Because the complaint does not allege facts establishing federal jurisdiction or plausibly state a claim, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff may file either an amended complaint or a response to this order addressing the basis for federal jurisdiction and why her complaint is sufficient, no later than February 8, 2023. The Case Management Conference set for March 31, 2023 is vacated. II. THE COMPLAINT2 …