Loewenthal

Loewenthal v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20235:22-cv-04077California2,022 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 CHOLENA LOEWENTHAL, Case No. 22-cv-04077-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. AMEND AND REMAND

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD

COMPANY,

11 Defendant. 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Cholena Loewenthal’s motion to amend the complaint to add two additional defendants and to remand the case to state court. For the reasons discussed herein, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint and remand this action to Monterey County Superior Court. I. BACKGROUND As alleged in the Complaint, Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”) is the largest railroad in North America. ECF No. 1, Ex. A (“Compl.”) ¶ 3. On February 9, 2021, at approximately 2:45 p.m. in the area of Bridge Street and Market Way in Salinas, California, Plaintiff Cholena Loewenthal was struck by a train owned and operated by Union Pacific. Id. ¶ 7. She “suffered catastrophic, near fatal injuries…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.