Banos

Johnson v. Banos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20233:22-cv-00673California1,528 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DARRELL EUGENE JOHNSON, Case No. 22-cv-00673-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SERVICE

v.

CARLOS BOLONOS, Defendant.

12 Plaintiff, a former detainee, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The second amended complaint was dismissed with leave to amend, and plaintiff filed a third amended complaint. DISCUSSION STANDARD OF REVIEW Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.