Anonomatic Inc. v. Skyflow Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20233:22-cv-01469California1,261 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ANONOMATIC INC., Case No. 3:22-cv-01469-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

v. INJUNCTION

SKYFLOW INC., Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Anonomatic Inc. and defendant Skyflow Inc. are competitors in the data security and encryption space. Anonomatic contends that Skyflow has infringed a federally registered trademark, “PII Vault,” Reg. No. 6,430,066. Dkt. No. 1. “PII” denotes personal identifying information, and “Vault” conveys secure storage. See Dkt. No. 1 ¶¶ 10, 16-18; Dkt. No. 24 at 6. The utility of the “PII Vault” mark is said to relate to the companies’ efforts to “sell complex data encryption software” to entities that are required to securely store personal information of customers and the like. Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 25. Anonomatic alleges claims for trademark infringement, unfair competition and false designation of origin, and dilution under Sections 32(1), 43(a), and 43(c) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq. Id. ¶¶ 31-54.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.