Camacho

Camacho v. Alliant Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20235:22-cv-01690California3,467 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 YULIANA CAMACHO, Case No. 22-cv-01690-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

ALLIANT CREDIT UNION, [Re: ECF No. 35] Defendant.

12 In this case, Plaintiff Yuliana Camacho challenges Defendant Alliant Credit Union’s (“Alliant”) denial of her loan application on the basis of her immigration status or alienage. She alleges that Alliant denied her loan application upon learning that she was a recipient of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”). Plaintiff seeks to represent a nationwide class as well as a California subclass. Now before the Court is Alliant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See ECF No. 35 (“MTD”); see also ECF No. 42 (“Reply”). Plaintiff opposes the motion. ECF No. 40 (“Opp.”). The Court held a hearing on the motion on December 15, 2022. See ECF No. 45. For the following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.