Bioscience Advisors, Inc. v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BIOSCIENCE ADVISORS, INC., Case No. 21-cv-00866-HSG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S RULE 56(D)

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND MOTION EXCHANGE COMMISSION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 60, 62 Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court are Defendants United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), Gary Gensler, National Archives and Records Administration (“NARA”), and Debra Steidel Wall’s (collectively, “Defendants”)1 Motion for Summary Judgment (see Dkt. No. 60 (“Mot.”)) and Plaintiff Bioscience Advisors, Inc.’s (“Bioscience” or “Plaintiff”) Rule 56(d) Motion. See Dkt. No. 62 (“R. 56(d) Mot.”). For the reasons articulated below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES Plaintiff’s Rule 56(d) Motion.2 I. BACKGROUND This case involves two Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) claims challenging the National Archives and…