RJ

RJ v. Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20235:20-cv-02255California1,441 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 RJ, et al., Case No. 20-cv-02255-EJD (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE DECEMBER 29, 2022

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE THOMAS

RALSTON

CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Re: Dkt. No. 129 12 Defendants.

14 The parties ask the Court to resolve a dispute concerning plaintiffs’ objections to 15 producing certain documents relating to Thomas Ralston, a former employee of defendant 16 MultiPlan, Inc. Dkt. No. 129. The Court held a hearing on the matter on January 10, 2023. Dkt. 17 No. 137. 18 During the hearing, defendants confirmed that they seek the following categories of 19 documents: 20 1. Documents sufficient to show the nature of the consulting work Mr. Ralston performed 21 for plaintiffs’ counsel of record and/or their respective law firms. 22 2. Documents sufficient to show the amounts paid or due to be paid to Mr. Ralston or his 23 consulting firm for the consulting work performed. 24 3. Communications and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.