Ross

Ross v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20235:21-cv-05196California6,283 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 D.R., Case No. 21-cv-05196-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. Nos. 19, 21 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff D.R.1 appeals a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”)2 denying her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 423, 1381, et seq. D.R. contends that the ALJ erroneously concluded that her mental impairments are not severe, did not properly evaluate certain medical opinions, and did not properly assess her residual functional capacity (“RFC”) in concluding that she can perform other jobs in the national economy and therefore is not disabled. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 19, 21. D.R. did not file a reply brief. The matter was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.