MasterObjects, Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20233:21-cv-05428California1,388 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MASTEROBJECTS, INC., Plaintiff, No. C 21-05428 WHA

v.

META PLATFORMS, INC., ORDER RE AMENDED BILL OF

COSTS

Defendant.

15 Following summary judgment in its favor, defendant sought to recover $59,991.56 in taxable costs. After counsel for the parties met and conferred, defendant filed an amended bill of costs that reduced its requested recovery to $40,319.31. Plaintiff now objects to $14,657.36 of that total, which corresponds to the cost of videotape copies of depositions ($4,859.30), reproduction of exhibits to depositions ($4,011.38), and preparation of visual aids ($5,786.68). To the extent stated herein, plaintiff’s objections are SUSTAINED. First, plaintiff argues that defendant is not entitled to recover the cost of videotape copies of depositions for which it also sought the cost of stenographic transcripts under Civil Local Rule 54-3(c)(1). This rule provides that a prevailing party may recover “[t]he cost of an …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.