FullView, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20233:18-cv-00510California714 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FULLVIEW, INC., Case No. 18-cv-00510-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO STAY CASE PENDING

APPEAL

POLYCOM, INC., Docket No. 216 Defendant.

12 13 Plaintiff FullView, Inc. (“FullView”) filed suit against Defendant Polycom, Inc. (“Polycom”) for patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,128,143 (“the ’413 patent”). The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment on infringement. The Court granted FullView’s motion for summary judgment of infringement of the patent-at-suit on November 7, 2022. Docket No. 213. Polycom then appealed to the Federal Circuit on November 17, 2022. Docket No. 215. Now pending before this Court is Polycom’s motion to stay the case pending appeal. Docket No. 216. Whether a stay is appropriate depends on three factors: “(1) the possible damage which may result from the granting of a stay, (2) the hardship or inequity which a party may suffer in being required to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.