Cornet
Cornet v. Twitter, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 EMMANUEL CORNET, et al., Case No. 3:22-cv-06857-JD
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE ARBITRATION
v.
TWITTER, INC., Defendant.
14 Named plaintiffs Emmanuel Cornet, Justine De Caires, Grae Kindel, Alexis Camacho, and Jessica Pan sued defendant Twitter, Inc., on behalf of themselves and a putative class of other Twitter employees, alleging that recent layoffs by Twitter violated federal and state laws. Dkt. No. 1 (original complaint); Dkt. No. 40 (second amended complaint). Twitter asks for an order compelling the individual claims of these named plaintiffs to arbitration pursuant to the parties’ arbitration agreements and the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). Dkt. No. 18. Plaintiffs filed an opposition. Dkt. No. 37. Arbitration is granted. BACKGROUND The salient facts are undisputed. Plaintiffs signed arbitration agreements as part of their employment contracts with Twitter, which date from September 2017 to April 2021. Dkt. No. 18- 1,…