Neo4j, Inc. v. PureThink, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20235:18-cv-07182California5,971 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NEO4J, INC., et al., Case No. 5:18-cv-07182-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

PURETHINK, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 132 Defendants.

This action involves disputes relating to Defendants PureThink LLC’s, iGov Inc.’s, and John Mark Suhy’s (collectively, “Defendants”) use of graph database management software belonging to Plaintiffs Neo4j, Inc. (“Neo4j USA”) and Neo4j Sweden AB (“Neo4j Sweden,” collectively with Neo4j USA, “Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs assert various claims arising out of Defendants’ continued use of the Neo4j mark after Defendants’ license expired, while Defendants assert counterclaims for interference with prospective economic advantage and declaratory relief. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings (“Motion”) to dismiss Defendants’ First, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.