Sanderlin

Sanderlin v. City of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20235:20-cv-04824California960 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 DERRICK SANDERLIN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-04824-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING THE

v. STIPULATED MOTION TO SEAL

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., [Re: ECF No. 110] Defendants.

12 On January 11, 2023, the parties filed a stipulated administrative motion to seal. ECF No. 110 (“Mot.”). The parties seek to seal specified information in interrogatory responses from one of the plaintiffs, which interrogatory responses were an exhibit to a declaration submitted by Defendants in support of their motion for summary judgment. See id. The Court GRANTS the motion to seal. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.