Sanchez

Johnson v. Sanchez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20234:22-cv-07858California169 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAUL DAVID JOHNSON, Case No. 22-cv-07858-JSW Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Vv. RECONSIDERATION SANCHEZ, et al., Wl Defendants. ECF No.

Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. He has not obtained, nor requested, || leave to file such a motion, as required by Local Rule 7-9. Secondly, Plaintiffs challenges to the 14 || order of dismissal satisfy none of the grounds for reconsideration enumerated in Rule 60(b). His || disagreement with the Court’s analysis and conclusion can be raised on appeal but does not a 16 || present a basis for reconsideration under Rule 60. See Twentieth Century - Fox Film Corp. v. || Dunnahoo, 637 F.2d 1338, 1341 (9th Cir. 1981). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 17, 2023 /) / \ Halu) Whe /ABFEREY S. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.