Forrest

Forrest v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20235:22-cv-03699California1,314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ANDREW FORREST, Case No. 5:22-cv-03699-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR

STAY OF DISCOVERY ORDERS

FACEBOOK, INC., PENDING REVIEW

Defendant. 12 Re: ECF No. 53 13 14 On January 2, 2023, Magistrate Judge DeMarchi issued two discovery orders in this case. The first required Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”)1 to supplement its initial disclosures by 16 identifying witnesses it may use to support its claims or defenses. ECF No. 42 (“Initial Disclosure 17 Order”). The second required Facebook and Plaintiff Andrew Forrest (“Dr. Forrest”) to jointly file 18 a proposed protective order consistent with Magistrate Judge DeMarchi’s directions. ECF No. 43 19 (“PO Order”). 20 Facebook moves for a stay of both discovery orders pending this Court’s review of its 21 objections to those orders (ECF Nos. 55, 56). Dr. Forrest did not timely file an opposition, so…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.