Norman
Norman v. Federal Bureau Investigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GARRED F. NORMAN, Plaintiff, No. C 22-07648 WHA
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF ORDER DISMISSING CASE AND INVESTIGATION, et al., DENYING MOTIONS FOR
RECONSIDERATION
Defendants.
16 In its previous order, the Court reiterated that plaintiff’s failure to pay the $400.00 filing fee by January 18, 2023, would result in dismissal of the above-captioned action without prejudice (see Dkt. No. 12; see also Dkt. No. 5). It is now January 19, 2023, and plaintiff has still not paid. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff’s motions for reconsideration of the orders denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis and denying his motion to appoint counsel are DENIED. Our court of appeals has held that “[m]otions for reconsideration may properly be denied where the motion fails to state new law or facts.” In re Agric. Rsch. & Tech. Grp., Inc., 916 F.2d 528, 542 (9th Cir. 1990). It has also held that leave to proceed in…