Strojnik
Strojnik v. Starbucks Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 PETER STROJNIK, Case No. 22-cv-07094-CRB
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
v. DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH VEXATIOUS
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, LITIGANT PREFILING ORDER
AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
Defendant. MOTION TO STRIKE
Plaintiff Peter Strojnik (“Strojnik”) alleges in his amended complaint that Defendant Starbucks Corporation (“Starbucks”) discriminates against customers with disabilities, in violation of various federal and state statutes. See Am. Compl. (dkt. 11). Starbucks moves to dismiss and for sanctions because Strojnik’s amended complaint violates a vexatious litigant prefiling order in place in this district. See Mot. to Dismiss (dkt. 16). As explained below, finding this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court GRANTS Starbucks’ motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND On July 21,…