Strojnik

Strojnik v. Starbucks Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20233:22-cv-07094California2,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 PETER STROJNIK, Case No. 22-cv-07094-CRB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH VEXATIOUS

STARBUCKS CORPORATION, LITIGANT PREFILING ORDER

AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Defendant. MOTION TO STRIKE

Plaintiff Peter Strojnik (“Strojnik”) alleges in his amended complaint that Defendant Starbucks Corporation (“Starbucks”) discriminates against customers with disabilities, in violation of various federal and state statutes. See Am. Compl. (dkt. 11). Starbucks moves to dismiss and for sanctions because Strojnik’s amended complaint violates a vexatious litigant prefiling order in place in this district. See Mot. to Dismiss (dkt. 16). As explained below, finding this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court GRANTS Starbucks’ motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND On July 21,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.