Keegan

Washington v. Keegan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20233:22-cv-03028California2,559 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JASON LEVETTE WASHINGTON, Case No. 22-cv-03028-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

M. KEEGAN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 20 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is defendants Keegan and Abrams’ motion to dismiss the complaint. Dkt. No. 20. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. See Dkt. No. 26. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Further, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Complaint is DISMISSED against all defendants, with leave to amend on or before February 20, 2023. 17 BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jason Levette Washington filed the instant lawsuit pro se on May 23, 2022. Dkt. No. 1. The complaint names as defendants M. Keegan and K. Abrams (hereafter the “Deputies”), who are deputies in the Alameda County Sheriff’s Department; the Alameda County Superior Court; several Doe defendants, who are alleged to be employees of the Sheriff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.