LBT IP II LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20233:22-cv-03985California2,203 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LBT IP II LLC, Case No. 22-cv-03985-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. STAY

UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., Re: Dkt. No. 105 Defendant.

12 Defendant Uber Technologies Inc. (“Uber”) moves to stay this action pending the final resolution of ongoing inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings concerning two of the four patents- in-suit. Plaintiff LBT IP II LLC (“LBT”) opposes the stay. Under Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), I find this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATE the hearing scheduled for January 25, 2023. Uber’s motion is GRANTED, as the case is at a relatively early stage, a ruling from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) will simplify the issues at hand, and LBT has not shown that it will be unduly prejudiced by a stay. BACKGROUND On November 19, 2021, LBT sued Uber in the Western District of Texas, alleging the infringement of four of LBT’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.