Davis

Davis v. County of Napa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20233:21-cv-04603California585 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KATINA DAVIS, et al., Case No. 21-cv-04603-JCS

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING STIPULATION

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS

COUNTY OF NAPA, SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

On January 4, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice the claims of two opt-in plaintiffs, Ryan Ralston and Emmanuel Solorzano. See dkt. 57. The stipulation indicates, and counsel for the parties confirmed at the January 20, 2023 case management conference, that Ralston and Solorzano have not complied with their discovery obligations and have not responded to outreach from Plaintiffs’ counsel. As discussed at that case management conference, the Court is not satisfied that counsel has authority to dismiss these individuals’ claims with prejudice without their consent. The stipulation is therefore DENIED. Based on the representations in the stipulation and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.