Goodrich

Goodrich v. Cross River Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20233:21-cv-09296California3,314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JULIA GREENFIELD, Case No. 21-cv-09296-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE; GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION CROSS RIVER BANK, TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS;

AFFORDING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO

Defendant. AMEND; CONTINUING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

13 Before the Court are two motions filed September 28, 2022, by defendant Cross River Bank ("CRB"): (1) "Motion to Dismiss Second Cause of Action and to Strike Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f)"; and (2) "Motion to Strike Class Allegations Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(d)(1)(D)." The motions have been fully briefed. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motions, the Court rules as follows.1 A. Motion to Dismiss/Strike In the first of the two above-referenced motions, CRB seeks an order dismissing for failure to state a claim the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.