Gilmore

Gilmore v. Safe Box Logistics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20233:21-cv-06917California2,198 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 JANICE GILMORE, Case No. 21-cv-06917-TLT (RMI)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE

v. LETTER BRIEF

SAFE BOX LOGISTICS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 89 Defendants.

13 Now pending before the court is a discovery dispute letter brief through which Plaintiff seeks to compel certain interrogatory responses and document production. See Ltr. Br. (dkt. 89) at 1-3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. By way of background, Plaintiff has filed a putative wage and hour class action lawsuit against Defendant FedEx Ground (“FedExG”) and one of its many contract service providers, Defendant Safe Box Logistics, Inc. (“SafeBox”). Id. at 1. The essence of this case can be distilled down to the following disagreement: while FedExG disputes “that it ever had an employment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.