Chand

Chand v. Regan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20233:21-cv-07773California2,558 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHARON S. CHAND,

Case No. 21-cv-07773-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

MICHAEL S. REGAN, DISMISS

13 Defendant.

15 I. INTRODUCTION Pro se Plaintiff Sharon Chand brings this employment disability discrimination suit against Defendant Michael S. Regan, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). The suit raises four claims for relief: disparate treatment, hostile work environment, failure to accommodate, and retaliation. After Defendant moved to dismiss the initial complaint in its entirety, the first two claims were allowed to proceed, while the latter two claims were dismissed. Plaintiff filed the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), and Defendant now moves to dismiss in part. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is denied as to the claim for failure to accommodate, and it is denied in part and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.