Linne

Linne v. Alameda Health System

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20233:22-cv-04981California2,453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LINDA KAY LINNE,

Case No. 22-cv-04981-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM,

13 Defendant.

15 I. INTRODUCTION In this action, pro se Plaintiff Linda Kay Linne asserts claims of discrimination and retaliation against her former employer Defendant Alameda Health System, pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA). Defendant moves to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), claiming the complaint does not allege an actionable claim. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), Defendant’s motion to dismiss is suitable for disposition without oral argument; the hearing set for January 26, 2023 is therefore vacated. For the reasons discussed below—including Plaintiff’s failure to plead a claim based on a disability as defined under the ADA—the motion to dismiss is granted, with leave…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.