Hernandez
Hernandez v. Syncrasy
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 GERARDO HERNANDEZ, Case No. 21-cv-09212-CRB
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S
v.
STATE-LAW CLAIMS FOR LACK
OF SUPPLEMENTAL
SYNCRASY, et al., JURISDICTION Defendants.
Plaintiff Gerardo Hernandez (“Hernandez”) filed suit against Defendants Syncrasy and Franklin St. RC Apartments LLC (together, “Defendants”) for failure to provide wheelchair-accessible parking and facilities in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), and denial of full and equal access to public facilities under California Health and Safety Code § 19955(a). See Compl. (dkt. 1). On October 11, 2022, the Court ordered Hernandez to show cause why it should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim. Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) (dkt. 37). Hernandez has since responded and filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. See OSC Response (dkt.…